-
00:00
1.
Enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of LUTS/BPH
-
00:26
2.
Introduction
-
01:53
3.
Introduction II
-
06:10
4.
Enucleation Techniques of HoLEP
-
06:47
5.
Slide 5
-
08:31
6.
Slide 6
-
10:25
7.
HoLEP
-
13:43
8.
Enucleation becoming a common trend
-
14:52
9.
Efficacy and Complicationsof HoLEP
-
15:00
10.
Slide 10
-
16:17
11.
Slide 11
-
16:58
12.
HoLEP vs. B-TURP
-
17:48
13.
HoLEP vs. Greenlight PVP
-
19:09
14.
HoLEP vs. Greenlight PVP II
-
19:34
15.
Durability of HoLEP
-
20:04
16.
HoLEP for Large Glands
-
22:08
17.
Why is HoLEP still not popular?
-
23:20
18.
The Learning Curve
-
23:39
19.
The Learning Curve II
-
24:39
20.
Slide 20
-
25:21
21.
Slide 21
-
25:47
22.
The conversion rate to conventional hospitalisation at the end of Day 1: 4% (two cases of haematuria with clots)The return rate of micturition at Day 2: 91%. After 3 months of follow-up the readmission rate: 16% (the causes of readmission: AUR without cl
-
26:55
23.
Tools for Enucleation
-
27:37
24.
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate
-
28:14
25.
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate II
-
29:50
26.
HoLEP vs. Bipolar Enucleation
-
30:28
27.
HoLEP vs. Thulium Laser Enucleation
-
30:59
28.
PVP Photoselective vaporization of the prostate
-
33:06
29.
Slide 29
-
33:37
30.
Advantages and Drawbacksof Enucleation
-
33:47
31.
Advantages
-
34:04
32.
Drawbacks
-
34:44
33.
Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
35:08
34.
Prostaic Arterial Embolization(PAE)
-
35:21
35.
Slide 35
-
35:28
36.
Slide 36
-
35:40
37.
Slide 37
-
35:47
38.
Slide 38
-
36:01
39.
Slide 39
-
36:11
40.
Slide 40
-
36:39
41.
Thank you for your kind attention.